<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>BPWrap  - Latest Comments in A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing from a different point of view</description><atom:link href="https://bpwrap.disqus.com/a_small_peephole_on_google_supplemental_results_bpwrap/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:09:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/08/a-small-peephole-on-google-supplemental-results/#comment-2007868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure whether as Michael points out, different data centres may produce different results.  In my searches, the &lt;a href="site:domain.com/&amp;amp;" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="site:domain.com/&amp;amp;"&gt;site:domain.com/&amp;amp;&lt;/a&gt; search always produces the same number of web pages as &lt;a href="site:domain.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="site:domain.com/"&gt;site:domain.com/&lt;/a&gt; search.  I did not look at the ordering of those web pages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/08/a-small-peephole-on-google-supplemental-results/#comment-2007867</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm... For one new site of about 100 pages, I am seeing 35 pages show up with site:&lt;a href="http://domain.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://domain.com"&gt;http://domain.com&lt;/a&gt;.  An exact copy of the top eight of those 35 shows in a search for site:&lt;a href="http://domain.com/*" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://domain.com/*"&gt;http://domain.com/*&lt;/a&gt;.  Using site:&lt;a href="http://domain.com/&amp;amp;" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://domain.com/&amp;amp;"&gt;http://domain.com/&amp;amp;&lt;/a&gt; shows 33 pages, in a slightly different order than the other two searches.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth Able</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/08/a-small-peephole-on-google-supplemental-results/#comment-2007866</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree, Michael, but I don't think Google sees how its bottom line will be better off if it goes along with our wishes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/08/a-small-peephole-on-google-supplemental-results/#comment-2007865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've only been using the site:domain/&amp;amp; and site:domain/* queries with trepidation but they appear to be working for me.  It may be that, if Google is closing down the reporting, they are doing on a data center-by-data center basis or perhaps through a recrawl of the Web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simply doing away with visible indications of their Web Apartheid is not acceptable.  Google needs to treat all Supplemental Pages equally with all Main Web Index pages -- let them rank competitively for queries, pass link anchor text, and pass PageRank.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, Google is always welcome to stop allowing sites to pass link anchor text.  It's a poor measurement of relevance that has been way overabused by the SEO industry and spammers alike.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@Michael_Martinez</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:24:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/08/a-small-peephole-on-google-supplemental-results/#comment-2007864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the comment, webprofessor.  It certainly is the final result that counts.  However the % of web pages in the regular index gives a quick alert relative to similar websites if you have a global problem or not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:10:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Small Peephole On Google Supplemental Results | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/08/a-small-peephole-on-google-supplemental-results/#comment-2007863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats a really nice find. I don't know if I care much though about the supplemental index. I tend to just rely on my logs to determine if my pages are important enough for google. I mean honestly if I am not in the supplemental index but on page 10 of the serps is there really a difference?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webprofessor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>