<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>BPWrap  - Latest Comments in Social Media - Bad News Travels Faster | BPWrap</title><link>http://bpwrap.disqus.com/</link><description>Internet Marketing from a different point of view</description><atom:link href="https://bpwrap.disqus.com/social_media_bad_news_travels_faster_bpwrap/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:48:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social Media - Bad News Travels Faster | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/03/social-media-bad-news-travels-faster/#comment-2007459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I heartily agree, Bill. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry Welford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:48:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media - Bad News Travels Faster | BPWrap</title><link>http://blog.cre8asite.net/bwelford/2007/03/social-media-bad-news-travels-faster/#comment-2007458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would venture to guess that Lee's post received more traffic because of the omission than it would have otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And he may have gained some new readers from Cre8asite, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A little controversy isn't necessarily always a bad thing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 13:42:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>